Some things have surfaced during the last couple of weeks of readings and networking that have been rather like 'the light coming on' - aha moments (?Hay), if you will.
Bruce's (1997, p. 22) idea of "co-existing literacies" has clarified role discrepancies which have been making me feel uneasy for several years. At a school I know well, the library is managed by someone who has undeniable organisational and entrepreneurial skills but no formal TL qualifications. The principal appointed a specialist ICT teacher to collaborate with the class teachers in putting the technology aspects into their programs. They plan collaboratively but the lessons are separate/isolated and I now comprehend that this is placing the focus on only 1 or 2 literacies out of the many, although this is where the NSW Board of Studies has also placed major emphasise.
The lack of collaborative teaching also disadvantages the students in that they miss out on the benefit of having two teachers in the room guiding them in their information gathering and coaching them in their development of relevant skills.
I now believe that this ICT specialist (who has also evolved into the website developer/manager) is a substitute TL. It appears obvious that there is either no school-wide information literacy policy incorporating the role of the TL, or the principal has not been aware of the content of the policy, or perhaps previous TLs have been too pre-occupied (through lack of support staff) with Librarian/Manager/Administration aspects of the role that the T part has completely slipped through the cracks.
A comment from a casual teacher who was visiting the school (and who has completed this subject last year) also highlighted the fact that the staff at this school do not appear to really understand the concept of collaboration. Each stage (group of teachers) allocates one of their number to write each unit of work - they also incorporate resources which they believe should be used, but which often turn out to be their own individual resources which are no longer available when they leave, and are often unavailable/out of print, etc.). The school works on a two year teaching cycle and when each unit comes around one teacher is allocated to teach every class in the stage for that particular unit. Again, no real collaboration.
This also means that the resources are very specific - little provision is made for students finding their own information, or collaboratively constructing their own new knowledge.
An attempt at modelling resource based learning with a stage 3 class during a library lesson highlighted the fact that some students do not accept the concept of group work at all. This would indicate a need for further training and practice for these students.